BELGRADE -- Serbian Parliamentary Speaker Slavica Đukić-Dejanović said that she feels a need to attend the commemoration for Srebrenica victims.
Source: Beta
Close the entire text of the article here
She told Belgrade daily Danas that President Boris Tadić would be in attendance at the commemoration, "who will be representing the interests of all citizens", including parliament and her as the speaker.
Đukić-Dejanović said that the resolution for condemning crimes committed against Serbs during the conflicts of the 1990s in the former Yugoslavia, would be adopted during the time of the emergency session.
Previously, MPs adopted a declaration condemning the Srebrenica massacre.
Đukić-Dejanović said, however, that she was "upset by the fact that it (the new resolution) would not be adopted with a full consensus", because of the parties that insisted on one resolution for condemning all crimes and those who wanted their proposals to be adopted exclusively.
Shame on all of those in denial of genocide in Srebrenica!
(ja, 9 July 2010 22:09)
===…==
Shame on all those in denial of genocide against the Serbs.
Do you agree?
Not all the Muslims were killed by the Serbs. Some were killed by the Croats and some Croats were killed by the Muslims. Some Muslim were killed by the Muslims themselves.
Do we chalk up these deaths to Serbs as well? Are the Serbs guilty of all death or do they just have to pay the price for all?
So all of you who say that more Muslims died than just in Sreberenica, please look toward your pals the Croats and your own for the guilty.
One thing is for sure all the Serbian deaths can be chalked up to the Croats, Bosnian Muslims and K-Albanians. Now Three sides against one and you still cry you were the main victims? Either you increadibly bad fighter or you are simply lying.
BTW, count NATO as yourn own as well. Now who was actually the real victim?
(Peggy, 10 July 2010 09:26)
More Serbs in total have been ethnically and permanently displaced and killed in the wars.
The western media UNDER-COUNTED the Serb victims and always minimizes what happened.
Meanwhile it inflates the non-Serb deaths and counts temporary war-time displacement as ethnic cleansing.
Muslim and Croat soldiers who died in combat are counted as civilians and/or are claimed to have been killed execution style, despite there being no official autopsy reports available to prove the claims.
Serbs have plenty of detailed official autopsy reports (with Serb victims fully identified) and photographs which show the butchery of the Bosnian Muslim militants and army stationed in the Srebrenica and Zepa areas.
(ida, 8 July 2010 06:20)
Its strange that people eneter this forum and this topic-only to bring more conflict. What we need is reconciliation for the sake of future generations and not more cheerleading of war to stroke our own egos.
I feel great sorrow at the thought of the terrible things that happened during that time. In the eyes of my god all people are equal-and the death of each in any war is a crime, a terrible loss which affects so many.
god bless the souls of all those who died in that needless, evil conflict.
"Đukić-Dejanović said that the resolution for condemning crimes committed against Serbs during the conflicts of the 1990s in the former Yugoslavia, would be adopted during the time of the emergency session.
Previously, MPs adopted a declaration condemning the Srebrenica massacre."
So let me get this straight. The Serbian government will adopt a resolution condemning all crimes against Serbs during the Balkan wars, but regarding the qualitatively greater number of crimes committed by Serbian forces against Croats, Bosniaks and K Albanians, it condemns ONLY the most hideous one, that in Srebrenica in July 1995.
I guess that's "striking a balance" right?
(DimTuc, 7 July 2010 18:35)
"She told Belgrade daily Danas that President Boris Tadić would be in attendance at the commemoration, "who will be representing the interests of all citizens", including parliament and her as the speaker."
Tadic will NOT be representing all of the citizens because not all of the citizens of Serbia support this declaration of Serbian guilt for Srebrenica. This is evident by the fact that it only passed with 2 votes, and I believe the percentage of Serbs who believe there was a genocide of the Muslims there and that the Serbs were guilty is even smaller than that. I hate when the ruling coalition tries to lump all Serbs onto their side as if we agree with them in a consensual manner. On July 11 I will be having my own commemoration for the Serbs who were ruthlessly killed in that municipality by Muslims emanating outward from the so-called de-militarized safe zone of Srebrenica.
(Karanovic, 7 July 2010 13:11)
The very much disputed and contra-dicting "Srebrenica" case continue to hang like a propaganda goast over self-bashing flaggelant serbs it seems. Originally intended for western and internal muslim consumption it is now a self playing and growing industry, much like that one Norman Finkelstein writes about. It has now grown out of proportions and it´s imposible to see what is truth and what is fiction.
Clear however, are that orthodox serbian victims of muslim/western aggression in the very same place (3000+), seems worthless in comparision and nobody except their relatives and serbians with spine commemorates that atrocity.
(huh?, 7 July 2010 11:37)
The very much disputed and contra-dicting "Srebrenica" case continue to hang like a propaganda goast over self-bashing flaggelant serbs it seems. Originally intended for western and internal muslim consumption it is now a self playing and growing industry, much like that one Norman Finkelstein writes about. It has now grown out of proportions and it´s imposible to see what is truth and what is fiction.
Clear however, are that orthodox serbian victims of muslim/western aggression in the very same place (3000+), seems worthless in comparision and nobody except their relatives and serbians with spine commemorates that atrocity.
(huh?, 7 July 2010 11:37)
"She told Belgrade daily Danas that President Boris Tadić would be in attendance at the commemoration, "who will be representing the interests of all citizens", including parliament and her as the speaker."
Tadic will NOT be representing all of the citizens because not all of the citizens of Serbia support this declaration of Serbian guilt for Srebrenica. This is evident by the fact that it only passed with 2 votes, and I believe the percentage of Serbs who believe there was a genocide of the Muslims there and that the Serbs were guilty is even smaller than that. I hate when the ruling coalition tries to lump all Serbs onto their side as if we agree with them in a consensual manner. On July 11 I will be having my own commemoration for the Serbs who were ruthlessly killed in that municipality by Muslims emanating outward from the so-called de-militarized safe zone of Srebrenica.
(Karanovic, 7 July 2010 13:11)
More Serbs in total have been ethnically and permanently displaced and killed in the wars.
The western media UNDER-COUNTED the Serb victims and always minimizes what happened.
Meanwhile it inflates the non-Serb deaths and counts temporary war-time displacement as ethnic cleansing.
Muslim and Croat soldiers who died in combat are counted as civilians and/or are claimed to have been killed execution style, despite there being no official autopsy reports available to prove the claims.
Serbs have plenty of detailed official autopsy reports (with Serb victims fully identified) and photographs which show the butchery of the Bosnian Muslim militants and army stationed in the Srebrenica and Zepa areas.
(ida, 8 July 2010 06:20)
"Đukić-Dejanović said that the resolution for condemning crimes committed against Serbs during the conflicts of the 1990s in the former Yugoslavia, would be adopted during the time of the emergency session.
Previously, MPs adopted a declaration condemning the Srebrenica massacre."
So let me get this straight. The Serbian government will adopt a resolution condemning all crimes against Serbs during the Balkan wars, but regarding the qualitatively greater number of crimes committed by Serbian forces against Croats, Bosniaks and K Albanians, it condemns ONLY the most hideous one, that in Srebrenica in July 1995.
I guess that's "striking a balance" right?
(DimTuc, 7 July 2010 18:35)
Its strange that people eneter this forum and this topic-only to bring more conflict. What we need is reconciliation for the sake of future generations and not more cheerleading of war to stroke our own egos.
I feel great sorrow at the thought of the terrible things that happened during that time. In the eyes of my god all people are equal-and the death of each in any war is a crime, a terrible loss which affects so many.
god bless the souls of all those who died in that needless, evil conflict.
Shame on all of those in denial of genocide in Srebrenica!
(ja, 9 July 2010 22:09)
===…==
Shame on all those in denial of genocide against the Serbs.
Do you agree?
Not all the Muslims were killed by the Serbs. Some were killed by the Croats and some Croats were killed by the Muslims. Some Muslim were killed by the Muslims themselves.
Do we chalk up these deaths to Serbs as well? Are the Serbs guilty of all death or do they just have to pay the price for all?
So all of you who say that more Muslims died than just in Sreberenica, please look toward your pals the Croats and your own for the guilty.
One thing is for sure all the Serbian deaths can be chalked up to the Croats, Bosnian Muslims and K-Albanians. Now Three sides against one and you still cry you were the main victims? Either you increadibly bad fighter or you are simply lying.
BTW, count NATO as yourn own as well. Now who was actually the real victim?
(Peggy, 10 July 2010 09:26)
The very much disputed and contra-dicting "Srebrenica" case continue to hang like a propaganda goast over self-bashing flaggelant serbs it seems. Originally intended for western and internal muslim consumption it is now a self playing and growing industry, much like that one Norman Finkelstein writes about. It has now grown out of proportions and it´s imposible to see what is truth and what is fiction.
Clear however, are that orthodox serbian victims of muslim/western aggression in the very same place (3000+), seems worthless in comparision and nobody except their relatives and serbians with spine commemorates that atrocity.
(huh?, 7 July 2010 11:37)
"She told Belgrade daily Danas that President Boris Tadić would be in attendance at the commemoration, "who will be representing the interests of all citizens", including parliament and her as the speaker."
Tadic will NOT be representing all of the citizens because not all of the citizens of Serbia support this declaration of Serbian guilt for Srebrenica. This is evident by the fact that it only passed with 2 votes, and I believe the percentage of Serbs who believe there was a genocide of the Muslims there and that the Serbs were guilty is even smaller than that. I hate when the ruling coalition tries to lump all Serbs onto their side as if we agree with them in a consensual manner. On July 11 I will be having my own commemoration for the Serbs who were ruthlessly killed in that municipality by Muslims emanating outward from the so-called de-militarized safe zone of Srebrenica.
(Karanovic, 7 July 2010 13:11)
"Đukić-Dejanović said that the resolution for condemning crimes committed against Serbs during the conflicts of the 1990s in the former Yugoslavia, would be adopted during the time of the emergency session.
Previously, MPs adopted a declaration condemning the Srebrenica massacre."
So let me get this straight. The Serbian government will adopt a resolution condemning all crimes against Serbs during the Balkan wars, but regarding the qualitatively greater number of crimes committed by Serbian forces against Croats, Bosniaks and K Albanians, it condemns ONLY the most hideous one, that in Srebrenica in July 1995.
I guess that's "striking a balance" right?
(DimTuc, 7 July 2010 18:35)
More Serbs in total have been ethnically and permanently displaced and killed in the wars.
The western media UNDER-COUNTED the Serb victims and always minimizes what happened.
Meanwhile it inflates the non-Serb deaths and counts temporary war-time displacement as ethnic cleansing.
Muslim and Croat soldiers who died in combat are counted as civilians and/or are claimed to have been killed execution style, despite there being no official autopsy reports available to prove the claims.
Serbs have plenty of detailed official autopsy reports (with Serb victims fully identified) and photographs which show the butchery of the Bosnian Muslim militants and army stationed in the Srebrenica and Zepa areas.
(ida, 8 July 2010 06:20)
Shame on all of those in denial of genocide in Srebrenica!
(ja, 9 July 2010 22:09)
===…==
Shame on all those in denial of genocide against the Serbs.
Do you agree?
Not all the Muslims were killed by the Serbs. Some were killed by the Croats and some Croats were killed by the Muslims. Some Muslim were killed by the Muslims themselves.
Do we chalk up these deaths to Serbs as well? Are the Serbs guilty of all death or do they just have to pay the price for all?
So all of you who say that more Muslims died than just in Sreberenica, please look toward your pals the Croats and your own for the guilty.
One thing is for sure all the Serbian deaths can be chalked up to the Croats, Bosnian Muslims and K-Albanians. Now Three sides against one and you still cry you were the main victims? Either you increadibly bad fighter or you are simply lying.
BTW, count NATO as yourn own as well. Now who was actually the real victim?
(Peggy, 10 July 2010 09:26)
Its strange that people eneter this forum and this topic-only to bring more conflict. What we need is reconciliation for the sake of future generations and not more cheerleading of war to stroke our own egos.
I feel great sorrow at the thought of the terrible things that happened during that time. In the eyes of my god all people are equal-and the death of each in any war is a crime, a terrible loss which affects so many.
god bless the souls of all those who died in that needless, evil conflict.