EU Delegation to Serbia head Sem Fabrizi says there is no alternative to the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue on Kosovo and that status quo is not an option.
EU Delegation to Serbia head Sem Fabrizi says there is no alternative to the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue on Kosovo and that status quo is not an option.
Source: Tanjug
Close the entire text of the article here
(Tanjug)
"I do not think there is a possibility to maintain this situation, the status quo is not an option, it does not help either Serbia or Pristina. There is a need for dialogue to continue and reach an agreement," Fabrizi told the students at the Faculty of Political Science.
When students asked if the only option for the EU would be Serbia recognizing Kosovo, Fabizi replied that the EU is not an intermediary in the dialogue and does not prescribe or comment on the content of the agreement.
Fabrizi also said that the EU's common position, although some of its members do not recognize Kosovo, is that Belgrade and Pristina should normalize their relations, and stressed that the Belgrade-Pristina agreement should be in line with international law, reached on a compromise and be sustainable.
Ljiljana,
If Serbia were capable of retaliating in any way against Kosovo, it would have, including increasing taxes on products from Kosovo entering Serbia and BiH. Dacic can attempt to bribe the officials from the group of impoverished Banana Republics, but this will not prevent Serbia from recognizing the Republic of Kosovo.
(Mary, 31 March 2019 18:07)
@bert
If EU and Cefta do not mind 100%taxes why do you go on about Rep Serbia objecting. It's you here who tell us that we feel bad.
Carry on for ever. I just do not buy anything made in Kosovo, full stop 🛑.. You must remember Rep Serbia has a choice, options to retaliate but there is no need like I say I do not buy. My way. As for you albos obtaining serbian passports rep Serbia can and should increase price by 100%.You see!
(Ljiljana, 29 March 2019 21:22)
"Belgrade-Pristina agreement should be in line with international law, reached on a compromise and be sustainable"
Sem Fabrizi should know that can only be achieved in line with UN resolution 1244 which is the only agreement "under international law" of which he quotes.
The forcible break up of Kosovo by NATO bombs, threats and coercion is contrary to "international law" , contrary to NATO's Charter, contrary to the United Nations Charter, contrary to the Helsinki Accords and any other international law for the past 100 year's which was smashed with the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.
(Jugoslavija, 28 March 2019 19:58)
"Belgrade-Pristina agreement should be in line with international law, reached on a compromise and be sustainable"
Sem Fabrizi should know that can only be achieved in line with UN resolution 1244 which is the only agreement "under international law" of which he quotes.
The forcible break up of Kosovo by NATO bombs, threats and coercion is contrary to "international law" , contrary to NATO's Charter, contrary to the United Nations Charter, contrary to the Helsinki Accords and any other international law for the past 100 year's which was smashed with the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.
(Jugoslavija, 28 March 2019 19:58)
@bert
If EU and Cefta do not mind 100%taxes why do you go on about Rep Serbia objecting. It's you here who tell us that we feel bad.
Carry on for ever. I just do not buy anything made in Kosovo, full stop 🛑.. You must remember Rep Serbia has a choice, options to retaliate but there is no need like I say I do not buy. My way. As for you albos obtaining serbian passports rep Serbia can and should increase price by 100%.You see!
(Ljiljana, 29 March 2019 21:22)
Ljiljana,
If Serbia were capable of retaliating in any way against Kosovo, it would have, including increasing taxes on products from Kosovo entering Serbia and BiH. Dacic can attempt to bribe the officials from the group of impoverished Banana Republics, but this will not prevent Serbia from recognizing the Republic of Kosovo.
(Mary, 31 March 2019 18:07)
"Belgrade-Pristina agreement should be in line with international law, reached on a compromise and be sustainable"
Sem Fabrizi should know that can only be achieved in line with UN resolution 1244 which is the only agreement "under international law" of which he quotes.
The forcible break up of Kosovo by NATO bombs, threats and coercion is contrary to "international law" , contrary to NATO's Charter, contrary to the United Nations Charter, contrary to the Helsinki Accords and any other international law for the past 100 year's which was smashed with the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999.
(Jugoslavija, 28 March 2019 19:58)
@bert
If EU and Cefta do not mind 100%taxes why do you go on about Rep Serbia objecting. It's you here who tell us that we feel bad.
Carry on for ever. I just do not buy anything made in Kosovo, full stop 🛑.. You must remember Rep Serbia has a choice, options to retaliate but there is no need like I say I do not buy. My way. As for you albos obtaining serbian passports rep Serbia can and should increase price by 100%.You see!
(Ljiljana, 29 March 2019 21:22)
Ljiljana,
If Serbia were capable of retaliating in any way against Kosovo, it would have, including increasing taxes on products from Kosovo entering Serbia and BiH. Dacic can attempt to bribe the officials from the group of impoverished Banana Republics, but this will not prevent Serbia from recognizing the Republic of Kosovo.
(Mary, 31 March 2019 18:07)