It has been almost three years since the Brussels Agreement was signed and even longer than Belgrade and Pristina have been negotiating to find a solution to the problem of Kosovo.
Ex-CIA officer: Kosovo should be divided along ethnic lines
It has been almost three years since the Brussels Agreement was signed and even longer than Belgrade and Pristina have been negotiating to find a solution to the problem of Kosovo.
Steven MeyerSource: nedeljnik.rs
Close the entire text of the article here
(Getty Images, illustration purposes, file)
So far the Brussels process has produced very little progress and the progress that has been achieved has been mostly on minor issues — such as telecommunications — that have little bearing on the major issues. But, in an act of desperation, these “minor” agreements are treated as major accomplishments by the government in Belgrade. If the negotiations continue to be approached as a series of technical issues it is very unlikely that there will be significant progress on what are truly major issues. It is noteworthy, for example, that there has been no progress on establishing an Association of Serb Communities because of Kosovar intransigence.
So far, the Brussels process has been a failure, just like every other effort since 1999, to find a just and equitable solution. As with past efforts, the Brussels process has failed because the questions of political legitimacy, and authority and mostly sovereignty are ignored. Until these questions are addressed honestly there will be very little — if any-progress on Kosovo.
The Kosovars are working from the perspective that the Serbs will do anything to please the EU and that Pristina can continue to be difficult because time is on their side. Leaders in Pristina believe that they have the West, especially the U.S., on their side and that Serbia has never had the initiative and never will have it. To a large extent, Pristina is right. The Vucic government has been so determined to sacrifice Kosovo on the EU altar that Belgrade has put Serbia on the defensive. Belgrade says Serbs will never surrender sovereignty over Kosovo. But bit by bit that is exactly what Belgrade is doing.
Every effort to “normalize” relations since 1999 has failed — primarily because they have not settled these fundamental questions. Every past effort has tried to satisfy both sides with intricate, complicated, ineffective, convoluted schemes. In 2007-8 the much heralded Ahtisaari Plan failed, as did the 2012 Five Point Plan by President Boris Tadic, which attempted to improve the Ahtisaari Plan. Belgrade’s proposal for “significant autonomy” for Kosovo if the province remained in Serbia was rejected almost immediately by Pristina. In 2010 the International Court of Justice ruled that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence did not violate international law. This not only ended in failure for Belgrade, it was a stinging embarrassment of Belgrade’s foolish strategy. Also in 2012, Prime Ministers Ivica Dacic and Hashim Thaci agreed on such issues as trade, customs and university diplomas in an effort to start more substantive negotiations. That effort also failed.
Most recently, the Serbian government’s agreement to “bottom-up technical negotiations” required by the Brussels process also has failed. In fact, it is a tacit surrender of sovereignty by Belgrade with nothing in exchange. To be clear, whenever Belgrade surrenders authority over even minor “technical” areas, it is surrendering sovereignty — and this is a violation of the Serbian Constitution as well as being a detriment to Serbia’s national interests. It is ironic that in 2015 Prime Minister Vucic said the Constitution will not change, and yet the government’s strategy so far has been to undermine the constitutional principle of Serb sovereignty over Kosovo. The only Serbian politician who has proposed an idea to move ahead on the major issues was Slobodan Samardzic who, in 2008, recommended a partition of Kosovo along ethnic lines. His recommendation was foolishly dismissed.
There has been significant pressure on Belgrade from the U.S. and members of the EU to “normalize” relations with Pristina and Serbia’s acquiescence to the Brussels Agreement has been rewarded with the opening of the Acquis Communautaire. Using the words “to ‘normalize’ relations between Belgrade and Pristina” sound very much like an arrangement between two sovereign countries. At least publicly that is not what Belgrade wants, but it is what Pristina wants. But, agreeing to the “technical” requirements of the Brussels process is not the only way to “normalize” relations, mollify the EU and still serve Serbia’s interests. After almost three years of nearly fruitless negotiations and strained relations with Pristina, it is time for Belgrade to find a different path.
But, a different path cannot replicate the failed “bottom-up” approach of trying to negotiate “technical issues.” Instead, the Vucic government — which has just received a new mandate — needs to develop a “top-down” approach that will deal with the major political issues. They are, after, all, where the heart of the matter lies.
The first step must be for the Vucic government to inform the EU and Pristina that it is suspending participation in the Brussels process because, after three years and constant Kosovar intransigence, it has failed to produce meaningful results. In addition, Belgrade must make it clear that Serbia is eager to engage in negotiations and will do so when a new, more fruitful framework has been established. Pristina will denounce this announcement and will seek to have the EU and the U.S. pressure Serbia. And, for certain, the EU, individual European states and the U.S. will pressure Serbia to reverse course. But, once the announcement has been made, Belgrade should not back away.
Second, Belgrade needs to establish a framework for negotiations that will serve Serbia’s interest, but one that also will be fair and just to all stake holders. In short, Belgrade needs to take a leadership role in the process, not assume the position of a weak supplicant. A new approach needs to establish a framework that actually engages the question of sovereignty. This approach has not been tried. The result has been to turn Kosovo into just one more unending “frozen conflict.” The Vucic government certainly has shown courage in defying the EU and the U.S. by refusing to apply sanctions against Russia. It must show the same courage in dealing with Kosovo.
At the same time, Belgrade’s framework must deal with two points of reality. First, Belgrade must accept the hard fact that Serbia will not get most of Kosovo back. Any attempt to do so would reignite war — a war Serbia could not win. Recently, according to the media, Foreign Minister Ivica Dacic said that he did not think that President-elect Trump would return Kosovo to Serbia. This is certainly correct. In the first place, Trump does not have the power, authority or right to return Kosovo to Serbia. Moreover, there would be no incentive for the new administration to try to do so. I know how important Kosovo is for Serbian history, culture and religion. And I know how very difficult it is for Serbs to accept the fact that sovereignty is lost over the area south of the Ibar River. But sadly, it is a fact that must be accepted if Serbia is to move on in a positive direction. Second, there are still about 150,000 Serbs living in Kosovo who deserve the support and protection of Serbia.
Of course, it must be the Serbian government that proposes a new framework. Nonetheless, allow me to recommend a potential course of action. To begin, Belgrade should pick upon Samardzic’s 2008 recommendation to divide Kosovo along ethnic lines. Accordingly, Serbia would exercise full sovereignty north of the Ibar River, where Serbs constitute more than 90 percent of the population. It is a chronically depressed area — characterized by high unemployment and poverty. This situation likely will get worse without a settlement of the sovereignty issue. It is a fate the people of Kosovska-Mitrovica do not deserve and a shame that the government of Serbia allows to continue. The suspension of participation by the Serb List in the Kosovar Assembly should demonstrate again how dire the situation is for Serbs in Kosovo and how urgent it is to find a solution.
At the same time, the region south of the Ibar River should be under Kosovar sovereignty. Any Albanians north of the Ibar River who do not want to live under Serbian sovereignty should be moved to the south as a humanitarian action that would be funded by the United Nations. Albanians who want to remain in the north must be guaranteed the right to a safe and prosperous life. This could be accomplished by an agreement between Belgrade and Pristina that is supervised and guaranteed by the United Nations and would include regular on the ground inspections to ensure the safety and prosperity of the Albanian population.
There also must be provision made for the Serb-majority communities and the historic and religious sites south of the Ibar River. These are primarily in the areas between Prizren and Urosevac and south and east of Pristina and the sacred sites in Pec, Decani and elsewhere. Serbs in these regions must be guaranteed the right to a safe, prosperous life and the sacred and historical sites fully protected. This process would be guaranteed by the same process of on the ground inspections to ensure the safety of the Serbs that is proposed for Albanians staying in the north. Any Serbs who do not want to live under Kosovar sovereignty should be move to the north or to Serbia proper as a humanitarian action funded by the United Nations. Further, all Serbs must have free, open and safe access to the Serb communities and sites anywhere in Kosovo — again, guaranteed by the United Nations.
An approach such as this would require extensive negotiations. Any negotiations should exclude direct U.S. or EU participation, since this would only lead to unnecessary pressures, cause delay and complicate the resolution of the issue. But, if such a political agreement could be reached, it would pave the way for multiple economic arrangements that would benefit both Serbia and Kosovo and might just pave the way for a new relationship between Serbia and the Republika Srpska. And, of course it would satisfy the EU’s requirement of a normalization of relations between Belgrade and Kosovo.
Dr. Steven Meyer is the National Security Program Chair at the Daniel Morgan Academy. He served 25 years in the Central Intelligence Agency as a senior intelligence analyst and manager and as Deputy Chief of the CIA’s Balkan Task Force in 1990s
Serbia should be divided along ethnic lines either! Because, It is well known fact that Serbs can barely maintain its existing territory due to the disadvantage so called “white plague”, very large number of minorities (Albanians, Bosnians, Hungarians, Vlachos, etc.), vague identity, and so on. Therefore, analysis provided by “famous” Ex-CIA officer are nothing but rubbish folded with clear intention to support Serbian propaganda!
(laki bani, 15 March 2017 09:17)
Tell the C.I.A. to draw up ethnic lines in California, Arizona, New Mexico & Texas with Latinos; Flordia with Cubans; New York with Jamacans, Hatians, Puerta Ricans; and Muslims in various states, so on and so forth, then tell other countries where to draw there lines. Learn to live by the sane rules you international thugs.UGWHB
(Mike Sujdovic, 4 February 2017 20:06)
the author sounds like he is still employed by CIA. all he is saying is "i am so sorry for serbs but just hand over kosovo".
Yugoslavia was divided to smaller countries intentionally by the West. it is easy to rule over smaller countries. they don't care about lives lost in the process.
(Hari, 19 January 2017 23:47)
@artur - Vojvodina which is majority Hungarian?! What are you writing about? I live in Vojvodina, this is not the truth. Serbia is not going to divide anymore. BiH is next on dividing list, RS should be independent country. Stop writing silly facts.
(Stanko, 19 January 2017 14:01)
If you start dividing Kosovo along ethnic lines you cannot stop there. You have to continue with South Serbia which is 90% Albanian and Vojvodina which is majority Hungarian. Then, who is next? Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Greece?? The whole Balkan would be a mess.
The political solution would be with all Balkan Countries in the European Union where the existing borders would be meaningless. In the meantime, all Balkan countries and nationalities have to learn how to accept and live with each-other. There is no place for nationalisms in the 21st century. Nikolic and Vucic should stop playing the Kosovo card before elections. If you play with the fire everybody gets burnt.
(artur, 18 January 2017 06:41)
Northen Albania has always been populated by albanians. Its never belonged to your beloved servia. There are no slavs in Northen Albania. Only Albanians. Always Albanians. Always will be Albanian. It was included in 1912 as OUR territory. On the other hand southern Montenegro and southern servia[ Sandzak, Presheva Valley] is Albanian territory stolen by slavs in the 19th century. We want those land back again
(Xenomorph, 16 January 2017 21:35)
It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that division along ethnic lines is the only solution for lasting peace. However, this should also be applied to Serbia, otherwise the only loser will be the Serbian people. Serbia must cut its loses and realize that a smaller Serbia can mean a more economically viable Serbia. Putting faith in Russia will only lead to more disappointment for the people of Serbia.
(Moderate Serb, 15 January 2017 17:09)
First Serbia needs to be divided along ethnic lines......
Then we can consider other things ...
Kosova suffered Genocide,War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity...
Kosova will be re-victimized.
Serbia attcked Slovenia,Croatia,Bosnia and Kosova....
Aggressor Serbia needs to be either significantly cut down in threat size or International community must implement a nation wide De-Nazification program....
(Azir, 15 January 2017 13:14)
I agree with most of the proposals, if some Albanian and Serbs wish to live under their respective country's that is fine they should have that right provided that Bujanovce and Presheva which are over 90 percent populated by ethnic Albanians Be partitioned and joining Kosovo and in turn Kosovo should be given the option to either be a sovereign country or join Albania proper, then there will be a long lasting peace in the balkans.
(Ned, 14 January 2017 21:47)
Cool. Lets divide serbia along ethnic lines as well. Presheva, Vojvodina, etc. If you Divide Kosovo along ethnic lines. Presheva and Medvegja will join Kosovo. What are you going to say: we cant allow Presheva and Medvexha then? Albanians will say, well, you thought it was OK for Mitrovica. By the way, start reporting real news, dont copy RT propaganda. You know it will never happen
(Nick, 14 January 2017 21:25)
What about carving up the US along ethnical lines?
(Joe A, 13 January 2017 10:38)
Joe,
Quite simply, there are no ethnic groups within America in favor of "carving it up". It is ridiculous to try drawing any comparisons between the former Yugoslavia and The U.S.
(US Special Forces, 14 January 2017 06:50)
"International community" should make up their minds - either way, but same for all.
(Sreten, 13 January 2017 17:17)
Only after Serbia has been sufficiently punished and all her victims have been paid war reparations. There are many Serb war criminals still on the loose.
(The Count of Kosova, 13 January 2017 23:59)
Peter the Rocky Mountains,
We understand each other this time.
"Sure we can do this, however it needs to be done fairly for all sides!
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander!!! "
Absolutely!
It also means carving up Croatia and Bosnia.
"International Community" set a firm rule that no REPUBLIC can be divided. And that they would rather have cleansing of the minority then to have republic divided (where are Serbs of Krajina today?).
Then they, oh wonder, changed their mind, and decided that some republics could be divided.
This should be good for goose, but leave gander alone....
And most people here seem to support inequality.
"International community" should make up their minds - either way, but same for all.
(Sreten, 13 January 2017 17:17)
An unnecessarily long article that ultimately calls for something that was rejected by all sides more than 10 years ago. Recycling discarded solutions for the sake of getting published doesn't do the author any credit other than showing that he's 10 years late to the discussion.
(Balkan Anthropologist, 13 January 2017 16:37)
Interesting analysis, however that would also mean Serbia would have to be carved up along ehtnic lines as a majority of Serbia's south
( preshevo, bujanoc, medvedja ) is ehtnic Albanian! It would mean the carving up of Macedonia were 45% of the population along the border with Albania & the Republic of Kosova is entirely Albanian also! Then we have the ulcini & tuzi regions of Montenegro that border Albania & The Republic of Kosova which is also majority Albanian!!! Sure we can do this, however it needs to be done fairly for all sides!
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander!!!
Now, when shall we start this project of redrawing our borders everyone ???
(Peter the Rocky Mountains, 13 January 2017 12:43)
"He served 25 years in the Central Intelligence Agency as a senior intelligence analyst and manager and as Deputy Chief of the CIA’s Balkan Task Force in 1990s".
That makes him in part responsible for the mess that is the Balkans now because the CIA meddled greatly in the affairs of the Balkans. Simply because Yugoslavia as an independent state had to disappear and be carved up in smaller manageable client states. And while the international community accuses ex Yugosav countries of carving up the area along ethnic lines, now he is just advocating that. Some nice piece of work this man.
What about carving up the US along ethnical lines?
(Joe A, 13 January 2017 10:38)
" agreement between Belgrade and Pristina that is supervised and guaranteed by the United Nations and would include regular on the ground inspections to ensure the safety and prosperity of the Albanian population. "
---
An obviously laughable fairy tale where a malfunctioning United Nations can guarantee - "prosperity"!
Meyer's expectations are as real as pots of gold carried by unicorns on rainbow covered streets in his CIA utopian fantasy.
A better strategy for all would be to wait for the CIA to completely deprioritize this corner of their warped world, and initiate a US exit strategy. The absence of interventionists will enable the indigenous population to seek their own solutions.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 13 January 2017 06:53)
If serbia cared about Kosovo why is Vucic still prime minister? Why isn't seselj prime minister? Why if Serbs cared about Kosovo are Serbs going to be calling Kosovo with its own country code? Why are Serbs training to be border and customs agents on Kosovo border? Why are Serbs competing against Kosovo in Olympics? Vucic needs to put a referendum on the ballot removing Kosovo from Serbia's constitution. It would pass easily.
(Brian., 13 January 2017 02:10)
Kudos b92 for publishing Kosovar instead of "Kosovo Albanians".
The author made some pretty big assumptions. I do think that the EU is the biggest trading partner for Serbia. If Serbia won't fall in line then no more preferential trade treatment.
Serbia does not have the economic expenditure to take these recommendations into reconsideration.
Tell the C.I.A. to draw up ethnic lines in California, Arizona, New Mexico & Texas with Latinos; Flordia with Cubans; New York with Jamacans, Hatians, Puerta Ricans; and Muslims in various states, so on and so forth, then tell other countries where to draw there lines. Learn to live by the sane rules you international thugs.UGWHB
(Mike Sujdovic, 4 February 2017 20:06)
@artur - Vojvodina which is majority Hungarian?! What are you writing about? I live in Vojvodina, this is not the truth. Serbia is not going to divide anymore. BiH is next on dividing list, RS should be independent country. Stop writing silly facts.
(Stanko, 19 January 2017 14:01)
Interesting analysis, however that would also mean Serbia would have to be carved up along ehtnic lines as a majority of Serbia's south
( preshevo, bujanoc, medvedja ) is ehtnic Albanian! It would mean the carving up of Macedonia were 45% of the population along the border with Albania & the Republic of Kosova is entirely Albanian also! Then we have the ulcini & tuzi regions of Montenegro that border Albania & The Republic of Kosova which is also majority Albanian!!! Sure we can do this, however it needs to be done fairly for all sides!
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander!!!
Now, when shall we start this project of redrawing our borders everyone ???
(Peter the Rocky Mountains, 13 January 2017 12:43)
"He served 25 years in the Central Intelligence Agency as a senior intelligence analyst and manager and as Deputy Chief of the CIA’s Balkan Task Force in 1990s".
That makes him in part responsible for the mess that is the Balkans now because the CIA meddled greatly in the affairs of the Balkans. Simply because Yugoslavia as an independent state had to disappear and be carved up in smaller manageable client states. And while the international community accuses ex Yugosav countries of carving up the area along ethnic lines, now he is just advocating that. Some nice piece of work this man.
What about carving up the US along ethnical lines?
(Joe A, 13 January 2017 10:38)
Peter the Rocky Mountains,
We understand each other this time.
"Sure we can do this, however it needs to be done fairly for all sides!
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander!!! "
Absolutely!
It also means carving up Croatia and Bosnia.
"International Community" set a firm rule that no REPUBLIC can be divided. And that they would rather have cleansing of the minority then to have republic divided (where are Serbs of Krajina today?).
Then they, oh wonder, changed their mind, and decided that some republics could be divided.
This should be good for goose, but leave gander alone....
And most people here seem to support inequality.
"International community" should make up their minds - either way, but same for all.
(Sreten, 13 January 2017 17:17)
An unnecessarily long article that ultimately calls for something that was rejected by all sides more than 10 years ago. Recycling discarded solutions for the sake of getting published doesn't do the author any credit other than showing that he's 10 years late to the discussion.
(Balkan Anthropologist, 13 January 2017 16:37)
the author sounds like he is still employed by CIA. all he is saying is "i am so sorry for serbs but just hand over kosovo".
Yugoslavia was divided to smaller countries intentionally by the West. it is easy to rule over smaller countries. they don't care about lives lost in the process.
(Hari, 19 January 2017 23:47)
" agreement between Belgrade and Pristina that is supervised and guaranteed by the United Nations and would include regular on the ground inspections to ensure the safety and prosperity of the Albanian population. "
---
An obviously laughable fairy tale where a malfunctioning United Nations can guarantee - "prosperity"!
Meyer's expectations are as real as pots of gold carried by unicorns on rainbow covered streets in his CIA utopian fantasy.
A better strategy for all would be to wait for the CIA to completely deprioritize this corner of their warped world, and initiate a US exit strategy. The absence of interventionists will enable the indigenous population to seek their own solutions.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 13 January 2017 06:53)
"International community" should make up their minds - either way, but same for all.
(Sreten, 13 January 2017 17:17)
Only after Serbia has been sufficiently punished and all her victims have been paid war reparations. There are many Serb war criminals still on the loose.
(The Count of Kosova, 13 January 2017 23:59)
If serbia cared about Kosovo why is Vucic still prime minister? Why isn't seselj prime minister? Why if Serbs cared about Kosovo are Serbs going to be calling Kosovo with its own country code? Why are Serbs training to be border and customs agents on Kosovo border? Why are Serbs competing against Kosovo in Olympics? Vucic needs to put a referendum on the ballot removing Kosovo from Serbia's constitution. It would pass easily.
(Brian., 13 January 2017 02:10)
Northen Albania has always been populated by albanians. Its never belonged to your beloved servia. There are no slavs in Northen Albania. Only Albanians. Always Albanians. Always will be Albanian. It was included in 1912 as OUR territory. On the other hand southern Montenegro and southern servia[ Sandzak, Presheva Valley] is Albanian territory stolen by slavs in the 19th century. We want those land back again
(Xenomorph, 16 January 2017 21:35)
First Serbia needs to be divided along ethnic lines......
Then we can consider other things ...
Kosova suffered Genocide,War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity...
Kosova will be re-victimized.
Serbia attcked Slovenia,Croatia,Bosnia and Kosova....
Aggressor Serbia needs to be either significantly cut down in threat size or International community must implement a nation wide De-Nazification program....
(Azir, 15 January 2017 13:14)
What about carving up the US along ethnical lines?
(Joe A, 13 January 2017 10:38)
Joe,
Quite simply, there are no ethnic groups within America in favor of "carving it up". It is ridiculous to try drawing any comparisons between the former Yugoslavia and The U.S.
(US Special Forces, 14 January 2017 06:50)
Kudos b92 for publishing Kosovar instead of "Kosovo Albanians".
The author made some pretty big assumptions. I do think that the EU is the biggest trading partner for Serbia. If Serbia won't fall in line then no more preferential trade treatment.
Serbia does not have the economic expenditure to take these recommendations into reconsideration.
I agree with most of the proposals, if some Albanian and Serbs wish to live under their respective country's that is fine they should have that right provided that Bujanovce and Presheva which are over 90 percent populated by ethnic Albanians Be partitioned and joining Kosovo and in turn Kosovo should be given the option to either be a sovereign country or join Albania proper, then there will be a long lasting peace in the balkans.
(Ned, 14 January 2017 21:47)
Cool. Lets divide serbia along ethnic lines as well. Presheva, Vojvodina, etc. If you Divide Kosovo along ethnic lines. Presheva and Medvegja will join Kosovo. What are you going to say: we cant allow Presheva and Medvexha then? Albanians will say, well, you thought it was OK for Mitrovica. By the way, start reporting real news, dont copy RT propaganda. You know it will never happen
(Nick, 14 January 2017 21:25)
If you start dividing Kosovo along ethnic lines you cannot stop there. You have to continue with South Serbia which is 90% Albanian and Vojvodina which is majority Hungarian. Then, who is next? Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Greece?? The whole Balkan would be a mess.
The political solution would be with all Balkan Countries in the European Union where the existing borders would be meaningless. In the meantime, all Balkan countries and nationalities have to learn how to accept and live with each-other. There is no place for nationalisms in the 21st century. Nikolic and Vucic should stop playing the Kosovo card before elections. If you play with the fire everybody gets burnt.
(artur, 18 January 2017 06:41)
It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that division along ethnic lines is the only solution for lasting peace. However, this should also be applied to Serbia, otherwise the only loser will be the Serbian people. Serbia must cut its loses and realize that a smaller Serbia can mean a more economically viable Serbia. Putting faith in Russia will only lead to more disappointment for the people of Serbia.
(Moderate Serb, 15 January 2017 17:09)
Serbia should be divided along ethnic lines either! Because, It is well known fact that Serbs can barely maintain its existing territory due to the disadvantage so called “white plague”, very large number of minorities (Albanians, Bosnians, Hungarians, Vlachos, etc.), vague identity, and so on. Therefore, analysis provided by “famous” Ex-CIA officer are nothing but rubbish folded with clear intention to support Serbian propaganda!
(laki bani, 15 March 2017 09:17)
First Serbia needs to be divided along ethnic lines......
Then we can consider other things ...
Kosova suffered Genocide,War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity...
Kosova will be re-victimized.
Serbia attcked Slovenia,Croatia,Bosnia and Kosova....
Aggressor Serbia needs to be either significantly cut down in threat size or International community must implement a nation wide De-Nazification program....
(Azir, 15 January 2017 13:14)
Northen Albania has always been populated by albanians. Its never belonged to your beloved servia. There are no slavs in Northen Albania. Only Albanians. Always Albanians. Always will be Albanian. It was included in 1912 as OUR territory. On the other hand southern Montenegro and southern servia[ Sandzak, Presheva Valley] is Albanian territory stolen by slavs in the 19th century. We want those land back again
(Xenomorph, 16 January 2017 21:35)
If you start dividing Kosovo along ethnic lines you cannot stop there. You have to continue with South Serbia which is 90% Albanian and Vojvodina which is majority Hungarian. Then, who is next? Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Greece?? The whole Balkan would be a mess.
The political solution would be with all Balkan Countries in the European Union where the existing borders would be meaningless. In the meantime, all Balkan countries and nationalities have to learn how to accept and live with each-other. There is no place for nationalisms in the 21st century. Nikolic and Vucic should stop playing the Kosovo card before elections. If you play with the fire everybody gets burnt.
(artur, 18 January 2017 06:41)
It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that division along ethnic lines is the only solution for lasting peace. However, this should also be applied to Serbia, otherwise the only loser will be the Serbian people. Serbia must cut its loses and realize that a smaller Serbia can mean a more economically viable Serbia. Putting faith in Russia will only lead to more disappointment for the people of Serbia.
(Moderate Serb, 15 January 2017 17:09)
Cool. Lets divide serbia along ethnic lines as well. Presheva, Vojvodina, etc. If you Divide Kosovo along ethnic lines. Presheva and Medvegja will join Kosovo. What are you going to say: we cant allow Presheva and Medvexha then? Albanians will say, well, you thought it was OK for Mitrovica. By the way, start reporting real news, dont copy RT propaganda. You know it will never happen
(Nick, 14 January 2017 21:25)
"International community" should make up their minds - either way, but same for all.
(Sreten, 13 January 2017 17:17)
Only after Serbia has been sufficiently punished and all her victims have been paid war reparations. There are many Serb war criminals still on the loose.
(The Count of Kosova, 13 January 2017 23:59)
Kudos b92 for publishing Kosovar instead of "Kosovo Albanians".
The author made some pretty big assumptions. I do think that the EU is the biggest trading partner for Serbia. If Serbia won't fall in line then no more preferential trade treatment.
Serbia does not have the economic expenditure to take these recommendations into reconsideration.
I agree with most of the proposals, if some Albanian and Serbs wish to live under their respective country's that is fine they should have that right provided that Bujanovce and Presheva which are over 90 percent populated by ethnic Albanians Be partitioned and joining Kosovo and in turn Kosovo should be given the option to either be a sovereign country or join Albania proper, then there will be a long lasting peace in the balkans.
(Ned, 14 January 2017 21:47)
What about carving up the US along ethnical lines?
(Joe A, 13 January 2017 10:38)
Joe,
Quite simply, there are no ethnic groups within America in favor of "carving it up". It is ridiculous to try drawing any comparisons between the former Yugoslavia and The U.S.
(US Special Forces, 14 January 2017 06:50)
Interesting analysis, however that would also mean Serbia would have to be carved up along ehtnic lines as a majority of Serbia's south
( preshevo, bujanoc, medvedja ) is ehtnic Albanian! It would mean the carving up of Macedonia were 45% of the population along the border with Albania & the Republic of Kosova is entirely Albanian also! Then we have the ulcini & tuzi regions of Montenegro that border Albania & The Republic of Kosova which is also majority Albanian!!! Sure we can do this, however it needs to be done fairly for all sides!
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander!!!
Now, when shall we start this project of redrawing our borders everyone ???
(Peter the Rocky Mountains, 13 January 2017 12:43)
If serbia cared about Kosovo why is Vucic still prime minister? Why isn't seselj prime minister? Why if Serbs cared about Kosovo are Serbs going to be calling Kosovo with its own country code? Why are Serbs training to be border and customs agents on Kosovo border? Why are Serbs competing against Kosovo in Olympics? Vucic needs to put a referendum on the ballot removing Kosovo from Serbia's constitution. It would pass easily.
(Brian., 13 January 2017 02:10)
Serbia should be divided along ethnic lines either! Because, It is well known fact that Serbs can barely maintain its existing territory due to the disadvantage so called “white plague”, very large number of minorities (Albanians, Bosnians, Hungarians, Vlachos, etc.), vague identity, and so on. Therefore, analysis provided by “famous” Ex-CIA officer are nothing but rubbish folded with clear intention to support Serbian propaganda!
(laki bani, 15 March 2017 09:17)
"He served 25 years in the Central Intelligence Agency as a senior intelligence analyst and manager and as Deputy Chief of the CIA’s Balkan Task Force in 1990s".
That makes him in part responsible for the mess that is the Balkans now because the CIA meddled greatly in the affairs of the Balkans. Simply because Yugoslavia as an independent state had to disappear and be carved up in smaller manageable client states. And while the international community accuses ex Yugosav countries of carving up the area along ethnic lines, now he is just advocating that. Some nice piece of work this man.
What about carving up the US along ethnical lines?
(Joe A, 13 January 2017 10:38)
Peter the Rocky Mountains,
We understand each other this time.
"Sure we can do this, however it needs to be done fairly for all sides!
What's good for the goose is also good for the gander!!! "
Absolutely!
It also means carving up Croatia and Bosnia.
"International Community" set a firm rule that no REPUBLIC can be divided. And that they would rather have cleansing of the minority then to have republic divided (where are Serbs of Krajina today?).
Then they, oh wonder, changed their mind, and decided that some republics could be divided.
This should be good for goose, but leave gander alone....
And most people here seem to support inequality.
"International community" should make up their minds - either way, but same for all.
(Sreten, 13 January 2017 17:17)
" agreement between Belgrade and Pristina that is supervised and guaranteed by the United Nations and would include regular on the ground inspections to ensure the safety and prosperity of the Albanian population. "
---
An obviously laughable fairy tale where a malfunctioning United Nations can guarantee - "prosperity"!
Meyer's expectations are as real as pots of gold carried by unicorns on rainbow covered streets in his CIA utopian fantasy.
A better strategy for all would be to wait for the CIA to completely deprioritize this corner of their warped world, and initiate a US exit strategy. The absence of interventionists will enable the indigenous population to seek their own solutions.
(Amnesty Yugoslavia, 13 January 2017 06:53)
Tell the C.I.A. to draw up ethnic lines in California, Arizona, New Mexico & Texas with Latinos; Flordia with Cubans; New York with Jamacans, Hatians, Puerta Ricans; and Muslims in various states, so on and so forth, then tell other countries where to draw there lines. Learn to live by the sane rules you international thugs.UGWHB
(Mike Sujdovic, 4 February 2017 20:06)
@artur - Vojvodina which is majority Hungarian?! What are you writing about? I live in Vojvodina, this is not the truth. Serbia is not going to divide anymore. BiH is next on dividing list, RS should be independent country. Stop writing silly facts.
(Stanko, 19 January 2017 14:01)
An unnecessarily long article that ultimately calls for something that was rejected by all sides more than 10 years ago. Recycling discarded solutions for the sake of getting published doesn't do the author any credit other than showing that he's 10 years late to the discussion.
(Balkan Anthropologist, 13 January 2017 16:37)
the author sounds like he is still employed by CIA. all he is saying is "i am so sorry for serbs but just hand over kosovo".
Yugoslavia was divided to smaller countries intentionally by the West. it is easy to rule over smaller countries. they don't care about lives lost in the process.
(Hari, 19 January 2017 23:47)