BELGRADE -- European Parliament (EP) Rapporteur Jelko Kacin says Kosovo is no barrier to Serbia’s EU integration process.
Source: Beta, Tanjug
Close the entire text of the article here
“First and foremost, Serbia has to work for itself, and I think that it can enter the EU considerably faster than Kosovo and be an example to Kosovo and help it,” Kacin told B92.
Asked about Serbia’s plans to ask the opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Kosovo’s declaration of independence, the EP rapporteur replied that Serbia had a right to try anything it believed was productive, but that it would have to face the consequences.
“The chances of a miracle happening are very small. If someone asks for an opinion, they must be prepared to accept a decision,” cautioned Kacin.
He said that the EU mission to Kosovo was “a year and a half late,” labeling it a “failure of Serbian policy” in defending the rights of the Kosovo Serbs.
Kacin said that he had told the Serbian officials that he had spoken to yesterday that the EU could adopt the Transitional Trade Agreement with Serbia if the Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) was ratified by September 15.
Asked whether the visa regime for Serbian citizens traveling to EU countries would be scrapped by the end of next year, the rapporteur said that the EU was not hindering Serbia, as the problem with biometric ID cards and passports in Serbia was not an EU matter.
“We’ll honor our promises once Serbia completes everything that’s necessary,” he explained.
Kacin did not want to say directly whether Serbia could become an EU member by 2014, adding that it had been unrealistic to expect accession talks between the EU and Croatia to finish in the first half of 2010.
“We have to find a solution for Ireland, which rejected the Lisbon Treaty. Until Ireland makes its mind up, no other country can become a candidate. Afterwards, Serbia could become one of the first countries to receive candidate status,” said the rapporteur.
Speaking about his draft report on Serbia's progress, he said he would not be able to put it in procedure before the SAA with the EU was ratified by the Serbian parliament.
“Without SAA ratification there will be no report, let alone a positive one,” he said after meeting Deputy Speaker Gordana Čomić, urging the Serbian authorities and opposition to reach an agreement as soon as possible and do what was best for Serbia.
“Nobody except the Serbian parliament can pass the necessary legislation for harmonizing regulations with those in effect in Europe and thus accelerate Serbia's integration in the EU,” he noted.
Kacin said he must inform the EP next week whether the conditions for putting his report into procedure had been secured.
“It would be good if the report could be presented at the end of October or the beginning of November, when the European Commission is also due to present its report on Serbia's progress, in order to encourage Serbia's endeavors for EU integration,” he said.
Kacin added that he had conferred with Serbian War Crimes Prosecutor Vladimir Vukčević on the progress the latter's office had made in cooperation with the Hague Tribunal.
“After the arrest of Radovan Karadžić, no-one in Europe can believe any longer that Ratko Mladić is not in Serbia too,” he insisted, adding that Serbia had the capacity to capture him and extradite him to the Hague Tribunal speedily, and thus be relieved of the burden of his crimes in order to turn to its own future and Europe.
The EP rapporteur told the press that he would not be meeting Serb Radical Party (SRS) Deputy leader Tomislav Nikolić, and that this had not been his own decision, adding that his duty was to hear the official views of all parties, but whether they wanted to take this opportunity was up to them.
Čomić said that the SAA and its ratification had been the key issues of her conversation with Kacin.
The obstruction of parliament's work by the opposition was unproductive, she said, expressing hope that agreement on future work would be reached soon without denying any rights to the opposition.
The dialogue focused openly on the difficulties in parliament's work and on the job the parliament had to do in order to show the results that the EU was interested in, she said.
“First and foremost, Serbia has to work for itself, and I think that it can enter the EU considerably faster than Kosovo and be an example to Kosovo and help it,” Kacin told B92
Why on earth would Serbia help Kosovo enter EU as a separate country?
It's like you see a thief robbing your house and you help him move the stuff into his truck.
Stop insulting Serbia's intelligence and go preach your rubbish to someone else.
(Peggy, 28 August 2008 03:33)
"My point is merely that this Slovenian expressing the opinion of his state should be replaced with someone from a friendly nation, such as those listed."
Kacin is not expressing his personal views, or the views of the Slovenian government. He is appointed and tasked by the European Parliament (or some foreign affairs commitee)
to observe and report on his findings. Appointed by the elected members of the EP/commitee, and not by his local government. As such his personal views, or that of his government, should play only an insignificant part of his findings.
--
(Jan Andersen, DK, 28 August 2008 01:11)
bganon, you are steering away from my point. When I talk about a country, I mean the decision and direction it is following. This is normally done by the leadership and not by the will of the people.
My point is merely that this Slovenian expressing the opinion of his state should be replaced with someone from a friendly nation, such as those listed.
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 20:32)
Well friends, why should this or that Kosovo-policy be crucial for EU integration, while there is no unique EU position towards Kosovo. Like it is no condition to not recognize Kosovo for beeing EU member. As far as I know Spain , Greece etc are not against Croatias EU membership although Croatia has recognized Kosovo.
(Stoning Rolle, 27 August 2008 16:42)
Surely ZK you know better than to think that citizens of a country are automatically a slave to their countries foreign policy.
If that was the case you would support the UK position, which thankfully you don't.
But I cant take your comment on this seriously, otherwise you are advocating something called discrimination. The discrimination against those that come from certain countries, regardless of their ability or opinions which may be completely at odds with their country.
And thank god for that, or those people that have a critical opinion.
(bganon, 27 August 2008 16:28)
bganon, how about Spain, Slovakia, Cyprus, Romania, Portugal or Greece. The UK has no respect for international law - it is just another well known servant of the US like Slovenia.
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 13:31)
Why is this person (a Slovenian) rapporteur to Serbia? He needs to be replaced with someone from a country that respects international law and order!
As we can clearly see, the path being promoted by this person is causing instability throughout the world.
I am glad the opposition is actively protecting Serbia's interests. It seems Frankenstein is still on the operating table - and it needs to be kept there!
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 11:07)
Anyone with a spare Kalashnikov and Yugo or Lada can join. I cannot believe, how great is the progress and how much better and safer is the world in 2008 than it was in 1988.
(Ataman (again in BG), 27 August 2008 10:20)
bganon, how about Spain, Slovakia, Cyprus, Romania, Portugal or Greece. The UK has no respect for international law - it is just another well known servant of the US like Slovenia.
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 13:31)
Why is this person (a Slovenian) rapporteur to Serbia? He needs to be replaced with someone from a country that respects international law and order!
As we can clearly see, the path being promoted by this person is causing instability throughout the world.
I am glad the opposition is actively protecting Serbia's interests. It seems Frankenstein is still on the operating table - and it needs to be kept there!
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 11:07)
Surely ZK you know better than to think that citizens of a country are automatically a slave to their countries foreign policy.
If that was the case you would support the UK position, which thankfully you don't.
But I cant take your comment on this seriously, otherwise you are advocating something called discrimination. The discrimination against those that come from certain countries, regardless of their ability or opinions which may be completely at odds with their country.
And thank god for that, or those people that have a critical opinion.
(bganon, 27 August 2008 16:28)
Anyone with a spare Kalashnikov and Yugo or Lada can join. I cannot believe, how great is the progress and how much better and safer is the world in 2008 than it was in 1988.
(Ataman (again in BG), 27 August 2008 10:20)
bganon, you are steering away from my point. When I talk about a country, I mean the decision and direction it is following. This is normally done by the leadership and not by the will of the people.
My point is merely that this Slovenian expressing the opinion of his state should be replaced with someone from a friendly nation, such as those listed.
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 20:32)
Well friends, why should this or that Kosovo-policy be crucial for EU integration, while there is no unique EU position towards Kosovo. Like it is no condition to not recognize Kosovo for beeing EU member. As far as I know Spain , Greece etc are not against Croatias EU membership although Croatia has recognized Kosovo.
(Stoning Rolle, 27 August 2008 16:42)
“First and foremost, Serbia has to work for itself, and I think that it can enter the EU considerably faster than Kosovo and be an example to Kosovo and help it,” Kacin told B92
Why on earth would Serbia help Kosovo enter EU as a separate country?
It's like you see a thief robbing your house and you help him move the stuff into his truck.
Stop insulting Serbia's intelligence and go preach your rubbish to someone else.
(Peggy, 28 August 2008 03:33)
"My point is merely that this Slovenian expressing the opinion of his state should be replaced with someone from a friendly nation, such as those listed."
Kacin is not expressing his personal views, or the views of the Slovenian government. He is appointed and tasked by the European Parliament (or some foreign affairs commitee)
to observe and report on his findings. Appointed by the elected members of the EP/commitee, and not by his local government. As such his personal views, or that of his government, should play only an insignificant part of his findings.
--
(Jan Andersen, DK, 28 August 2008 01:11)
Why is this person (a Slovenian) rapporteur to Serbia? He needs to be replaced with someone from a country that respects international law and order!
As we can clearly see, the path being promoted by this person is causing instability throughout the world.
I am glad the opposition is actively protecting Serbia's interests. It seems Frankenstein is still on the operating table - and it needs to be kept there!
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 11:07)
Anyone with a spare Kalashnikov and Yugo or Lada can join. I cannot believe, how great is the progress and how much better and safer is the world in 2008 than it was in 1988.
(Ataman (again in BG), 27 August 2008 10:20)
bganon, you are steering away from my point. When I talk about a country, I mean the decision and direction it is following. This is normally done by the leadership and not by the will of the people.
My point is merely that this Slovenian expressing the opinion of his state should be replaced with someone from a friendly nation, such as those listed.
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 20:32)
Well friends, why should this or that Kosovo-policy be crucial for EU integration, while there is no unique EU position towards Kosovo. Like it is no condition to not recognize Kosovo for beeing EU member. As far as I know Spain , Greece etc are not against Croatias EU membership although Croatia has recognized Kosovo.
(Stoning Rolle, 27 August 2008 16:42)
Surely ZK you know better than to think that citizens of a country are automatically a slave to their countries foreign policy.
If that was the case you would support the UK position, which thankfully you don't.
But I cant take your comment on this seriously, otherwise you are advocating something called discrimination. The discrimination against those that come from certain countries, regardless of their ability or opinions which may be completely at odds with their country.
And thank god for that, or those people that have a critical opinion.
(bganon, 27 August 2008 16:28)
bganon, how about Spain, Slovakia, Cyprus, Romania, Portugal or Greece. The UK has no respect for international law - it is just another well known servant of the US like Slovenia.
(ZK UK, 27 August 2008 13:31)
"My point is merely that this Slovenian expressing the opinion of his state should be replaced with someone from a friendly nation, such as those listed."
Kacin is not expressing his personal views, or the views of the Slovenian government. He is appointed and tasked by the European Parliament (or some foreign affairs commitee)
to observe and report on his findings. Appointed by the elected members of the EP/commitee, and not by his local government. As such his personal views, or that of his government, should play only an insignificant part of his findings.
--
(Jan Andersen, DK, 28 August 2008 01:11)
“First and foremost, Serbia has to work for itself, and I think that it can enter the EU considerably faster than Kosovo and be an example to Kosovo and help it,” Kacin told B92
Why on earth would Serbia help Kosovo enter EU as a separate country?
It's like you see a thief robbing your house and you help him move the stuff into his truck.
Stop insulting Serbia's intelligence and go preach your rubbish to someone else.
(Peggy, 28 August 2008 03:33)